Monday, November 7, 2016

Is My Candidte Out of Touch?

November 7, 2016 / D.J. Roach

I don't know about any of you but I have a hard time believing that any candidate that is worth multi millions or billions have one once of common ground with me. They don't suffer like me, they don't struggle like me or do they even partake in any of my circles. Just how would they know anything
about me or my wants, my needs or my dreams?

Maybe Napoleon Bonaparte was right when he said " Religion is what keeps the poor from murdering the rich."
I am not advocating some ridiculous reform against the rich by taking away any of their wealth, after all, capitalism has produced the poor to the rich for centuries. What I am proposing is why are you voting for a candidate who is so far out of touch from you? Donald Trump claims he started with a million dollar loan from his father. Who has that kind of privilege? This is the same guy who said,
" you have to be wealthy in order to be great." Sorry middle class  you just can't hold the candle, loser, according to Trump. Where is the common ground and exactly what makes you think he even cares about you the voter outside of the vote you cast at the ballot?

Trump is not the only one that falls in this grey area, Hillary Clinton with the abuse of the Clinton Foundation is another. Her pay to play, donations from foreign enmities and love affair with Goldman & Sachs. Unfortunately so many on the left live in a delusional bliss believing she can do no wrong because she has not been arrested yet. People, that is exactly what money can get you, "a get out of jail free card." Can you do that? Ask yourself, why is it the poor that fill our prisons, why is it these same people are defended by a court appointed attorney who is forced to put their name in a pool in order to practise law. They also only get a minimal fee for it. Yeah, that is most of America unlike the rich you pick to represent you as P.O.T.U.S. 
Then Candidates like 3rd party Gary Johnson Libertarian Party and Jill Stein Green Party are tossed to the wayside. Yes both are better off than most of us but they had to work hard to get to where they are unlike Trump or Clinton. I have more in common with the 3rd Party candidates not necessarily because of their platforms but because of where they come from and how they got to where they are now,You can read about them in the last piece I did. It is very apparent to me that the Duopoly System has made good use of it's political monopoly of the last 3 decades in it's brainwashing of the populace. Wait, what? Brainwashed how? I am glad you asked! If your voting for Donald Trump (R) or Hillary Clinton (D) then you are voting how they told you and want you to. You have excepted their choice for you as your own and don't even realize it. To everyone who has said the elections are rigged, Congrats, you are right but yet your going to vote out of your training and habit instead of your own clear conscience. You have decided to vote the two party system the root of everything you are against. Give it some deep thought before you cast your vote and ask yourself, Does my candidate have anything in common with me and am I totally comfortable with my vote.
A Patriots View

Sunday, November 6, 2016

The Candidates and the Issues

November 7, 2016 / D.J. Roach

"Political promises are much like marriage vows. They are made at the beginning of the relationship between candidate and voter, but are quickly forgotten." ~ Dick Gregory

Before we head out to the polls and cast our vote in an election most think our votes don't count in. I wanted to go over some of the issues and where the Presidential Candidates stand on them. I figured this wouldn't be a bad Idea since there are two I am including that the majority heard very little about. I opted to do this piece on the heels of a debates that was more like a roller coaster ride in the dark. With all the bellowing that Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump did I was hard pressed to figure out exactly where they stood, outside of both where certain neither are qualified to be President. But what do they say they stand on the issues?


Drugs
    Donald Trump: Agrees with Hillary on cautious approach to legalizing pot.
http://www.ontheissues.org/default.htm

The Problem with this is neither Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump would be eager to declassify Marijuana from a Schedule 1 narcotic causing Federal interference in the State issue's of legalization.



















































                          





                       2016 



Former Governor of New Mexico
Born: January 1st, 1953  (age 63)


In politics, compromises are frequently seen as a sign of selflessness which places the greater good of the country ahead of principled, yet divisive stances. Some would even venture to suggest that partisanship's are shortsighted and the surest way to hinder progress, and represents the greatest challenge to national unity.

And yet, between 1995 and 2003, during his tenure as governor of New Mexico, Gary Earl Johnson vetoed almost 800 bills (including line items) sent by the state legislature which led to arguably the state’s worst ever legislative gridlock. But his principled stand also massively reduced government spending, decelerated spending growth and wiped off the state’s budget deficit. By the end of his term, the treasury even reported a $1 billion surplus – all achieved without raising any taxes!

The son of a public school teacher and a government servant has always been viewed as too principled for politics. But as he had demonstrated during his two terms as governor, his methods work. Not all the time mind, as evidenced by his failed school voucher proposal and calls to decriminalize marijuana and reform drug laws, but the results speak for themselves.

However, while Gov. Johnson has intimated to friends of his desire to run for office from a very young age, he was very practical about the path he would take. While studying at the University of New Mexico, Gov. Johnson started a handyman business as means to achieve financial independence. After graduating with a degree in political science in 1975, his company, Big J Enterprises, expanded into remodeling and renovation, and eventually, construction.

His company grew rapidly and quickly, but managing it proved to be increasingly more difficult for the hands-on business owner. Ever the problem solver, Gov. Johnson took night classes on time management in 1987 to better equip himself to handle the challenges of managing a multimillion dollar company. It proved to be a catalyst for Gov. Johnson, and forced him to reassess his life, both professionally and personally. He became more goal-oriented, leading to some calling him the most disciplined individual they've ever known.

This probably explains why after being rebuked by the state Republican leadership in 1993, the young upstart still went on to contest the GOP primaries the following year; or his decision to leave the Republican Party in 2011 to seek a presidential nomination under the Libertarian Party ticket; or why he is so confident that a third party candidate (himself) will finally achieve the 15% national polling threshold in 2016 and qualify for the presidential debates for the first time since 1992.

Gov. Johnson is an ardent believer of liberty, individual rights and small government. He is against military intervention and high taxation. He is convinced that existing drug laws and policies are doomed to failure. Gov. Johnson is also a strong proponent of personal responsibility. He believes that anyone in the country can make their own fortune with hard work. In a 2000 interview, Gov. Johnson stated that “anybody that wants to be an entrepreneur in this country can make an absolute fortune. Even somebody who cleans houses… If I started a business tomorrow just cleaning houses by myself […] I think I could make $100,000 a year. You clean four houses at $100 a day. I know what these people do when they come in and clean. In three hours I could do what they do. I just don't buy into the notion that anybody can't still make it today if they are willing to work hard.”

One thing is for certain though. If Gary Johnson were to somehow be elected president, the triathlete will be the fittest president in American history.
http://2016.candidate-comparison.org/




2016 



Businessman, television personality and author 
Born: June 14th, 1946  (age 70)


When Donald John Trump announced his candidacy for the 2016 presidential election at the Trump Tower to an audience of about a thousand supporters on a blustery New York morning on June 16, 2015, no one could’ve anticipated the impact that he would have on this election cycle. No one (aside from Ann Coulter) could’ve even envisioned Mr. Trump winning the GOP presidential nomination. Unbeknownst to anyone at the time – even Mr. Trump himself -, there was a leadership void within the Republican Party that was crying out to be filled.

The billionaire’s no-nonsense style, outsider status, business savvy and keen political instincts drew in the support of blocks of politically frustrated middle class conservatives, tea partiers and Ron Paul’s orphaned paleolibertarians, who were all looking for a champion to lead them and give their struggle a voice. In the following months, these disparate groups of voters organically coalesced into a powerful coalition which has propelled Mr. Trump’s candidacy from the fringes of the race to the summit of the Republican nomination leader board with surprising, albeit controversial, ease.

And to think, the teetotaler wasn’t even certain about running as late early 2015. There were real fears that similar to the general elections of 1988, 2000, 2004, 2008 and 2012, Mr. Trump would not make a bid for the nomination despite giving indications that he might.

His giddying ascension in the polls has been met with incredulous wonder by the media and more established candidates who have long fallen to the wayside. His combative performances in the debates left his opponents tongue-tied, much to the delight of his supporters. His controversial off-the-cuff deliveries and political incorrectness are viewed proudly by his legion of followers. His war cry, Make America Great Again, has galvanized even the elderly to attend his lively rallies.

Mr. Trump’s in-your-face style has drawn a lot of flak from all corners, but only a fool would doubt that there is a method behind his apparent madness. As the former reality TV star has demonstrated repeatedly throughout his career, his audacity is always accompanied by a ferocious intelligence.

There is simply no denying that Mr. Trump has changed the face of American politics forever. And the prospect of a businessman being elected to the White House has rekindled century-old memories of the Roaring Twenties when entrepreneurs such as Warren G. Harding, Calvin Coolidge and Herbert Hoover occupied the Oval Office.

Mr. Trump’s nationalist populist brand of politics captured the imagination of the nation, and powered his victory in the Republican primaries. However, will the charismatic real estate tycoon be able to use an identical approach in his White House run, or will he pivot to the center and reign in his explosive personality? Will he be able to unite the party’s fractured base and win over the agitated social conservatives? Will Miley Cyrus move out of the country if Mr. Trump is elected?
http://2016.candidate-comparison.org/



2016 Democratic Presidential Nominee 



Former U.S. Secretary of State, U.S. Senator and First Lady


Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton
Born: October 26th, 1947  (age 69)

The sight of former president Bill Clinton wiping away tears of joy while standing silently behind his wife as she was making her victory speech in the 2000 Senate elections in New York may appear a little melodramatic for some. However, when one considers the sacrifices and extreme loyalty that Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton has shown to her husband over the previous 26 years, that gesture suddenly makes all the sense in world.

Secretary Clinton’s ascension to Senator, and thereafter, Secretary of State, is not something all that surprising for those that knew her, considering what a gifted child, student and political operative Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton was.

Born in Cook County and raised in suburban Park Ridge just outside of Chicago, Secretary Clinton grew up in a loving middle class family. Her early years were shaped by her Goldwater-Republican Navy veteran and business owner father and his tremendous work ethic, balanced against her mother’s Democratic leanings and harsh childhood.

At an age where young girls and boys were still too preoccupied with watching cartoons on TV, young Hillary was already busy demonstrating her leadership abilities and initiative with backyard carnivals and cookie and food drives for charity. When others her age were engrossed with the challenges of school and growing up, young Hillary was busy with the post-election canvassing of Chicago’s south side for the Republican Party. When children tread lightly around their parents and elders, she was engaged in delightfully spirited political debates with her family during dinner.

Her star continues to shine brightly at Wellesley, where her commencement address drew a seven-minute long standing ovation, and at Yale, where she was paid to intern at Washington every summer. She was already an experienced Democratic aide before even graduating from Yale, and was headhunted to be part of the Watergate impeachment inquiry team counseling House Democrats months after finishing college.

She was never a radical, beatnik or hippie, but neither was she a middle-of-the-road moderate. She is, above all, an idealist – an intelligent, disciplined, driven and practical idealist. Despite her image of a strong and uncompromising woman, people who she’s worked with reveal her to be a polite, considerate, consultative, and perhaps most surprisingly, religious individual. The latter perhaps is due to the influence of her mother and grandmother, both strong-willed Methodist women. She is also an exceptional public speaker, and can speak for an extended period of time without notes – done without pauses and filler syllables.

Over the years, many negative epithets have been used by the press and political opponents to describe her. As many have learned however, pigeonholing or underestimating Secretary Clinton often comes at a great cost.

The key to defeating Secretary Clinton lies in winning over her core support base - women, baby boomers and minorities. Meanwhile, her weakest demographic is the millennials, and this is clearly reflected in her underwhelming support online. And yet, one gets the impression that her opponents simply do not get this very simple equation. Will this prove costly in the end?

http://2016.candidate-comparison.org/



2016 Green Party Presidential Nominee 



Physician, Reformer, Environmental Activist


Jill Stein
Born: May 14th, 1950  (age 66)



It would be a mistake to think that Jill Ellen Stein, the Green Party’s nominee for president, is a lightweight candidate for the 2016 presidential election. An August 2016 McClatchy/Marist national poll showed the Illinois native polling at 16% among Americans under the age of 30 – almost twice as many as Republican presidential candidate, Donald Trump (9%). She also tied with Mr. Trump among undecided with 8%. Dr. Stein has clearly carved a following in the millennial voting demographic, which at 75.4 million, has surpassed the baby boomers as the largest living generation in the country.

The Harvard Medical School graduate, who also earned a B.A degree from Harvard College in 1973, spent about 25 years as a physician and researcher before transitioning into politics and social activism. Her first notable exposure to politics came in 1998 when she participated in the campaign to pass the Clean Elections Law in Massachusetts, a bill designed to reduce the influence of big-money lobbyists and special interest groups by limiting public money from being used to co-finance the political campaigns of candidates who refused to agree to a $100 contribution cap. However, five years later, the bill was repealed by the Democratic-controlled state legislature, a decision which prompted Dr. Stein to break her ties with the Democratic Party.

Her maiden run for public office came during the 2002 Massachusetts’ gubernatorial election, where under the banner of the Green-Rainbow Party, she finished third behind Republican Mitt Romney and Democrat Shannon O’Brien.

From the start, Dr. Stein’s core political philosophy has always been centered on the environment, renewable energy and campaign finance reform – issues that feature heavily in the Green New Deal, her pitch to the American people for the general election. The Green New Deal outlines her commitment to create “20 million living wage jobs that provide 100% clean renewable energy by 2030” while “reviving the economy, halting climate change, and making wars for oil obsolete.” Under Dr. Stein’s leadership, the Green Party will make a strong play in down-ballot races, with reportedly several hundred candidates contesting in Senate, House and state seats across the nation.

The high unfavorable ratings for both Mr. Trump and Democratic Party nominee Hillary Clinton has given her campaign a massive boost, and the Green Party is expected to appear on the ballots of up to 48 states and Washington D. C in this cycle, breaking the record of 2000 when Ralph Nader attained ballot access in 43 states.

Ms. Stein, the co-founder of the Massachusetts Coalition for Healthy Communities, is an avid musician and can play several musical instruments. She was also the lead vocalist for the folk-rock band, Somebody's Sister, which released four albums during the 90s (she sounds good, folks). 

http://2016.candidate-comparison.org/ 


The Libertarian Party (Gov.) Gary Johnson and the Green Party (Jill Stein) need 5% of the national vote for their parties to reach minor party status. Anything over 25% puts that party at Major Status with the Republican and Democrat Party's.
A Patriots View

Friday, November 4, 2016

The Election Day Blues

November 5th 2016
D.J.Roach

The Election Day Blues

As we near the day we all have been waiting for since all the primaries wrapped up. I can't help but to feel cheated, short changed and worn out by the political drama and biased everything. This is the worst election I have witnessed in my 35 years of voting. We all have witnessed the ugly head of the Duopoly System and the effects from the year after year of voting the lesser of two evils. Yes, that dance that has played out for some 150 years and things get worse with each promise of it getting better by Mr. / Mrs. Politician.

The truth of the matter is each of us should be ashamed of this fiasco that will forever be etched in history and how our generation dealt with the stewardship passed down to us generation after generation. Looking at the Republican and Democrat candidates it is easy to see we have failed.
Most people are voting for Trump because they fear Hillary and people are voting for Hillary because they fear Trump. With all that fear who has had time to breathe deep and consider what is really at stake? Once again, as the National Defense Authorization Act, Patriot Act and who knows what other Acts will be passed that strip us of our Constitution and our Rights. Instead we are worried about who we like less and voting in that manner?

Has everyone lost their freaking minds?

I know we all don't see things the same way after all we were raised differently but don't we all share some of the same hopes and dreams? Like sending our young men and woman across the oceans to fight the latest straw man created by our very own government, than to worry about a budget or reducing the deficit and debt that our children's children will inherit by our own ignorance? Is our own self preservation our own selfishness so valuable that we have forgotten what Integrity, Honor, Honesty, Morals and Character are? Or are they tossed out the window like a cigarette butt of a careless smoker? I for one, hope not.

Yes voters this gives me the blues, that we as a nation have bailed on the Constitution, Liberty, and Freedom. Come the 9th of November I hope many of us wake up to the thought of "What have I Done?" I also hope voting for the lesser of two evils this election is not the last nail in America's coffin. So, I hope the next 4 days we will take the opportunity to reflect and double check our values.

I don't know about any of you but I have grown tired of nation building regime change and intervention of countries we have no real national interest in. I am tired of piss poor candidates because we have dropped our standards for the sake of party. The two main candidates come riddled with conflict and questionable character exactly how do you think their Presidency will be? It's kind of ironic most of you hold your family members and friends at a higher standard than your choice of President. How does one come about that? All this makes me blue but not without hope.

Come November 8th I like you, will cast my vote but unlike you, I will not cast my vote out of fear or for parties sake. This will get you one of two things an Authoritarian or a Statist leader, Both are far removed from what our Constitutinal Republic is suppose to be. I will be casting mine on principle and the platform and character of my candidate. I will be voting for the guy none of you took seriously Gary Johnson.

Happy Blue Election Day to all of you.







Saturday, January 12, 2013

A Plea on the 2nd. Amendment

This is by far my favorite topic and that is anything that infringes on our Constitution and Bill of Rights.
I tell you this, there is no other Amendment as important as the 2nd. Amendment. This Amendment upholds and secures all the other rights that grant us Freedom and Liberty.It was put in the Bill of Rights to protect "We the People" from a any tyranny force that acted like King George III in whom they faced under extreme injustice in the beginnings of These United States of America.

Amendment II

"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."

This one sentence so simple and pure in it's content, has been one of the most abused rights we have.

The word Infringed was placed as a binding clause at the end of this Amendment, because, the men who drafted the Constitution and Bill of Rights were far more educated than the common man, who were mainly farmers in our early history. They knew they would have to write in the simplest of terms so all men could understand these Rights.Lets go back to the word "infringe" since it's a binding clause."Shall not be infringed" "Shall not be" means simply "Never".
While, Infringed 1.) Actively break the terms of (a law, agreement, etc.): "infringe a copyright". 2.) Act so as to limit or undermine (something); encroach on: "infringe on his privacy".( Websters Dictionary.) Here we are mainly looking at the second definition although both hold true. Any gun law by the terms of Constitution are simply Unconstitutional. Wait? But congress can change Amendments and the law! Yes,they can on most but looking at the first definition of "infringed" 1.) Actively break the terms of (a law, agreement, etc.): "infringe a copyright". "Actively" is a action word infringed nullifies the action due to the act of limiting or under minding of this right.

"And that the said Constitution be never construed to authorize Congress to infringe the just liberty of the Press, or the rights of Conscience; or to prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms; …"
Samuel Adams
quoted in the Philadelphia Independent Gazetteer, August 20, 1789, "Propositions submitted to the Convention of this State"

The Dick Act of 1902 also known as the Efficiency of Militia Bill
H.R. 11654, of June 28, 1902 invalidates all so-called gun-control laws.
It also divides the militia into three distinct and separate entities.

The three classes H.R. 11654 provides for are the organized militia,
henceforth known as the National Guard of the State, Territory and
District of Columbia, the unorganized militia and the regular army.

The militia encompasses every able-bodied male between the ages of 18 and
45. All members of the unorganized militia have the absolute personal
right and 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms of any type, and as
many as they can afford to buy.

The Dick Act of 1902 cannot be repealed; to do so would violate bills of
attainder and ex post facto laws which would be yet another gross
violation of the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The President of the United States has zero authority without violating
the Constitution to call the National Guard to serve outside of their
State borders.


"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms,( shall not be infringed.") Shall not be infringed is a protective clause. Shall not be=NEVER Infringed =1.) Actively break the terms of (a law, agreement, etc.): "infringe a copyright". 2.) Act so as to limit or undermine (something); encroach on: "infringe on his privacy".If this is the case then all attempts of a gun ban or control are Unconstitutional and The Bill of Rights is a signed binding document of the first acts of Congress and Senate. 

"I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."
George Mason
Co-author of the Second Amendment
during Virginia's Convention to Ratify the Constitution, 1788


Why do we want to have Semi Automatics weapons? This is simple, any tyrant force that would threaten us have automatic weapons!The passing of the NDAA and Patriot Act, has put the 4th,5th, and 6th Amendments into extreme jeopardy. If we loose our 2nd Amendment we as a people will have no means of ensuring to ourselves these rights granted to us by The Constitution's Bill of Rights. So for all that oppose any of the 2nd Amendment you really need to consider all your other Rights you will be throwing away or risking. Without our defense against tyranny the 2nd. Amendment, we will subdue to our own demise.

"The supposed quietude of a good man allures the ruffian; while on the other hand arms, like laws, discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as property. The same balance would be preserved were all the world destitute of arms, for all would be alike; but since some will not, others dare not lay them aside … Horrid mischief would ensue were the law-abiding deprived of the use of them."
Thomas Paine

"To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them."
Richard Henry Lee
American Statesman, 1788

This fact remains Evil men do Evil things all the gun control or bans simply make us victim's to a more extreme..